From Angela G. of Virginia.
Dating is not an appropriate activity for God's children. Dating doesn't
prepare anyone for marriage; it prepares you for divorce. You learn how to give
your heart to someone who will later cast you off for one reason or another. That
is, if you don't put them away first. You learn how to just leave a relationship
if things are not "just right". Dating in no way prepares you for the future of
staying with and loving your husband no matter what...
Also, it
is almost pure insanity to send two young people off alone and just hope that
nothing bad will happen. I heard of one young man who told his dad, "You don't
trust me!" His dad replied, "Go off alone in a car with a pretty young girl??
I wouldn't trust ME!!" And this is very true.
I have heard the
argument a hundred times that I cannot keep my children from having sex. This
is very true. If my children decide that this is what they are going to do, I
am quite sure they will find an opportunity. However, if they make a commitment
to the Lord to wait until they are married; I can help them to keep to their convictions.
If they have these convictions, and I send them off alone (with only their raging
hormones tagging along), I am setting them up to fail. It would be like ambushing
them. There are many more reasons for not dating, but I will stop here.
---------------------------------------------
Editorial by M.
VanNattan
Please read that second sentence again. The result of
serial dating is a softening toward divorce, almost a preparing for it. It's like taking
lessons ahead of time. They learn the excuses, the "lingo," and who will sympathize
with them. They learn to form the bonds of a romantic relationship easily
and then to break the bonds almost as easily. They learn to plan
ahead to dump their partner when things don't go right.
All
too often there have also been physical connections as well as emotional. It's bad enough for those who
try to remain virgins, but even worse for those who commit fornication.
They may also learn
to "two- time" their "steady" when they decide it's "not that big of a deal" to
flirt with other members of the opposite sex behind their partner's
back. After all, "we're not married yet" so this behavior is
considered "ok." But, this helps them learn patterns of behavior
that can then be repeated with different justifications after
marraige.
When the time arrives that their marriage is mess,
their experience with "take-in-or-leave-it" dating makes it very easy to get a divorce. They are
prepared for it. They know in a small way how it will feel - or so they think. It is only
"a little more complicated,"
and there is money involved!
What's so awful about living up to the high calling
of God? What's so awful about young people keeping themselves ONLY for the Lord
and the ONE person that He has chosen to be their spouse?
Proverbs
4:23 Keep thy heart with all diligence; for out of it are the issues of life.
Saint Valentine's Day
and the Dating Game
1 Peter 1:18 Forasmuch as ye know that
ye were not redeemed with corruptible things, as silver and gold,
from your vain conversation received by tradition from your fathers;
In the old days in the Roman Empire there was a
certain celebration that was observed called the festival of Lupercalia. Though
there seems to be some disagreement on exactly what or who was being worshipped
on this day, it is nevertheless certain that it was a vile and impure celebration.
In 496 A.D., in an effort to get the pagans' money and
allegiance,
Pope Gelasius "converted" the feast of Lupercalia to a Roman Catholic "holy
day" establishing St. Valentine's day in it's place. His original plan was apparently
to substitute the veneration of saints for the old customs.
Among
the pagan customs attributed to the "old" festival, however, is a very interesting
tradition. This particular practice, that is said to be the most popular, "was
a lottery in which young men drew the names of adolescent females from a box.
Whatever girl the young man picked would be his 'partner' for a year, a relationship
that was often sexual. (What happened at the end of the year? The kids held another
lottery...and the process started all over again.)" [Quoted from p. 192 of Pope-Pouri,
by John Dollison, Fireside, 1994.]
Several interesting things come
into consideration here.
1. The old festival has apparently enjoyed
a "revival" of sorts in the present day celebration of "Valentine's Day" which
has become a tradition in the USA. With it's Roman Catholic and pagan roots and
the modern day foolishness, this is obviously not a holiday for Christians to
observe. Not only is St. Valentine's Day a Catholic holiday, it has also reverted
very much to it's old roots in the present emphasis on lovers and romance (sadly
even among children) making it doubly wrong even for courting couples or married
people to observe this holiday.
2. Another tradition of America's
past which has its origins called in question by this bit of history is the so-called
"[Lunch] Box Social." This consists of an auction of the decorated lunch boxes
of the single young women in a school, church, etc.. The young man that bids
the highest for a box gets the "privildge" of eating with the owner, who
has packed enough food for 2 people. This "old fashioned fun" bears a striking
resmeblence to the old festival of Lupercalia, though generally without so much
physical involvement, if any. Certainly the emotions come into paly in a
large way. This also, is obviously not a thing for a Chrsitian to participate
in, let alone to suggest.
3. The obvious point here is the
similarity that this old Lupercalia custom has to our modern day "dating game."
While the present system is not set up on the "lottery" plan, it is very much
the same. The young people pair off, today for often much less than a year
at a time, and the relationships are often sexual or at least physical. Sadly
it is the "expected," if not accepted way even among so-called "Christians." While
today the competition is based on looks and who's "fun," the basic priciples are
still the same.
So, the modern practice of dating is called into
question, here by the similarity to this pagan custom of the past, and the relation
between this festival and the present day "St. Valentine's Day" observance is
obvious enough.
2 Corinthians 6:14 Be ye not
unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness
with unrighteousness? and what communion hath light with darkness? 15 And what
concord hath Christ with Belial? or what part hath he that believeth with an infidel?
16 And what agreement hath the temple of God with idols? for ye are the temple
of the living God; as God hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and
I will be their God, and they shall be my people. 17 Wherefore come out from among
them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing; and
I will receive you, 18 And will be a Father unto you, and ye shall be my sons
and daughters, saith the Lord Almighty.
-- M. VanNattan
The Journey Down
Mark
10:6 But from the beginning of the creation God made them male and female. 7 For
this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and cleave to his wife; 8
And they twain shall be one flesh: so then they are no more twain, but one flesh.
9 What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder.
From, The Pro-Life Activist's Encyclopedia, published by The
American Life League.
http://hebron.ee.gannon.edu/~frezza/plae/encyc031.html
CHAPTER 31. THE BIRTH CONTROL PILL: ENABLER OF THE SEXUAL REVOLUTION
...more than 40 percent of all couples in the United States
now live together ('shack up') before marriage. Their reason: They want to make
sure that they're "compatible." They don't want to rush into something that might
not work and cause pain for everyone involved. They say that it's best to have
a trial run first. Just to make sure, you see.
Sound sensible?
Of course it does! Is it sensible? Of course not!
In 1989,
James Bumpass, James Sweet, and Andrew Cherlin of the University of Wisconsin
completed a long-term study to determine the effect of prenuptial cohabitation
on marriage. Their findings showed that more than 75 percent of all couples who
lived together before marriage eventually divorced. This is a rate of more than
50 percent greater than the general population![25]
Why
is this?
There are two primary reasons;
(1) Those
people who 'shack up' are less traditional in their values. True commitment and
a willingness to 'work at it' are far more important to the success of a marriage
than a self-serving "fling." Obviously, many of those who 'shack up' initially
do not intend to get married.
(2) Those who have 'shacked up' are
naturally far more likely to commit adultery in marriage than those who haven't.
This makes sense -- adultery is, like fornication, a tangible result of lack of
discipline and self-control. Those who get used to "serial monogamy" before marriage
see no reason why they can't continue to practice it after marriage...
----------------------------------------------------------------
Editorial by Mary V.
What can we learn from this relating to
the "dating game?"
First of all, because they have engaged in dating
in the first place and found out first hand, often with fornication involved,
that things don't always "work out," they view marriage with that attitude also.
Because they did not set out from a marriageable age with the intent of determining
God's will about whom they should marry, they have come to the sinful idea that
there needs to be a "test run" to see if it will work out. Ironically they are
only making matters worse, as the statistics indicate.
Notice the
conclusions that these people draw regarding couples living together before marriage.
What better description for dating than a "self-serving 'fling'?" The
majority of dating is not done with any intention of marriage. How can a 14, 15,
16 year old kid out on a first date possibly have a serious thought about marriage? They're
in it for the prestige, the "fun," and the to see how far they can go without
doing "that"(whatever the pre-determined line may be that they have been told
not to cross). Sad to say, even undiscriminating courtship can fall into this
description.
Dating may very possibly produce the same effects
as the live-in principle. In other words, a softening of the conscious toward
adultery (and divorce) later. Even among "good" kids the idea of "serial monogamy"
can be used to describe their dating lives. Is it so shocking then to see them
later decide that they can't "work it out" with their spouse and throw it in for
"something better?" They have been doing this very thing for years and they
know it works. They have not only played fast and loose with temptation many times,
but more often than not, they have given in to it and they cannot see the death
that they are going to reap in their own lives when pay day comes.
James
1:14 But every man is tempted, when he is drawn away of his own lust, and enticed.
15 Then when lust hath conceived, it bringeth forth sin: and sin, when it is finished,
bringeth forth death. The
"pleasures
of sin for a season" (Heb 11:25 ) are too tantalizing to give up
for faithfulness at all costs in a marriage that they were not determined to see
through from the start.
Certainly the birth control methods that
are made so readily available to young people today have propelled the fornication
and "shacking up" to further depths than before. How many Christian parents have
been horrified to learn that their daughter is pregnant or their son is the father
of an unborn baby? And how much sorrow could have been and can be avoided by raising
kids from an early age with the thought and conviction that there is one person
whom God has chosen for them and that that person is to be found in an orderly,
biblical manner with the physical, spiritual, and emotional purity undamaged?
Proverbs 22:6 Train up a child in the way he should
go: and when he is old, he will not depart from it.
With the foolishness
that goes on with even young children, often at the instigation of fluff headed
mothers or women, it is a good idea to start their training in this as soon as
they are old enough to comprehend it.