The Paris Olympics,
Dionysus, and C. S. Lewis
By Mary E. Stephens
Aug. 2024
There was a tremendous flap this year over the
opening ceremony of the 2024 Olympics in Paris. The tableau that riled
up a lot of people will live in infamy to decent, God-fearing people.
The curious thing about it to me was that a
number of professing Christians tried to defend or excuse it based on
the painting "The Feast of the Gods" by Dutch artist Jan van Bijlert. As
time moved along and information was presented, it was brought out by
some that this painting was also a degraded imitation of a version of
"The Last Supper" by Leonardo DaVinci. As an artist and graphics
designer myself, I only needed to see a comparison of the two paintings
and the photograph of the infamous tableau to clearly see which one the
French artist was using as his inspiration. Other details that came to
light tended to confirm this, although it was denied by the French
artist and Olympic opening ceremonies committee after the fact.
Consequently, I will continue to refer to this
tableau as a mockery of Christ and the last supper from this point on.
Yes, the original painting was painted by a Roman Catholic. Yes, it was
a very poor representation of that actual event. It is not a painting
that I would want in my home. However, it is meant to be a respectful
portrayal of that event, so when wicked people make a point of turning
into an exultation of sex perversion and the worship of Dionysus, it is
an attack on the person of Jesus Christ and the sacrifice that He made
for our atonement - as represented in the last supper.
But...
There are several reasons that I'm unimpressed
with all the fervor over this wicked tableau.
The Olympics In France
First of all, the Olympics themselves have a
sketchy history. The original Olympic games were a sort of sports
festival that was both athletic and religious, and the date was selected
based on the first full moon after the summer solstice. They were held
at the temple of Zeus in Olympia, Greece. Ritual sacrifices to the
heathen gods Zeus and Pelops were an important part of the event. This
timeframe is said to be from the 8th century BC to the 4th century AD. [See
source.]
So, the Olympics are based solidly on an ancient
heathen event and the worship of false gods.
Secondly, France prides itself on being an open
society which not only accepts, but openly embraces many religions and
sinful lifestyles. They are proud of their freedoms and present form of
government, which sadly has a strong connection to the French Revolution
and its infamous and blood bathed Reign of Terror. The history of France
is fraught with hatred for God and righteousness. It should not have
come as a big shock that there would be blasphemy in their opening
ceremonies, especially at this juncture in history when almost nothing
truly holy is held with any respect by the general population of the
Western world.
Furthermore, Paris is a city with a long history
of debauchery and sinful indulgence. "Free love," luxurious excesses of
all sorts, and rebellion against decency have been an integral part of
its history. Take, for example, the Moulin Rouge which I have seen
repeatedly represented as one of "the places to go" when visiting Paris.
Personally, I don't find it all that shocking that they would consider
that debauched and rude tableau in the opening ceremonies to be
completely representative of their "great" city. I only wonder that
there hasn't been more of that type of thing coming from there. Perhaps
there has, and we just haven't been seeing it.
Luke 6:44-45 For every tree is known by his own
fruit. For of thorns men do not gather figs, nor of a bramble bush
gather they grapes. A good man out of the good treasure of his heart bringeth forth that which is good; and an evil man out of the evil
treasure of his heart bringeth forth that which is evil: for of the
abundance of the heart his mouth speaketh.
Dionysus
There was a blue man, almost completely naked,
lowered into the tableau at the opening ceremonies in Paris at some
point. There is a some confusion as to who exactly he is supposed to
represent, although it is generally accepted that it is meant to be
Dionysus. The actor that played the role reportedly claimed himself that
he was representing Dionysus. In my own research into the subject I
found that blue is not a color that is generally used for Dionysus. It
is, however, the color of the Hindu god Vishnu, and I found some images
of Vishnu with wreathes of roses that were very reminiscent of the blue
man in the Olympic tableau. Why this would be done is beyond me, except
that the idea was inclusiveness, and basically "anything goes" once a
group of people fully commit themselves to mock Jesus Christ. The
Dionysus of the tableau, contrary to some people's opinions, does not
resemble the Dionysus of the painting "The Feast of the Gods," for
whatever it's worth.
Again there was a strange point of view that was
commented upon by some. Apparently, there are people who actually
believe that when Paul wrote about the last supper in
1 Corinthians 11,
he was somehow making a connection to the feast of Dionysus (or Bacchus), with which they would have been familiar. This is, of course,
heretical.
The Lord's Supper, as we know and practice it,
is a remodeling of the Jewish Passover. The Apostle Paul specifically
refers to the night Jesus was betrayed in
1
Corinthians 11:23, For I have received of the Lord that which also I
delivered unto you, That the Lord Jesus the
same night
in which he was betrayed took bread:
We are told exactly what it is in
Luke 22:14-16, And when the hour was come, he
sat down, and the twelve apostles with him. And he said unto them, With
desire I have desired to eat this passover with you before I suffer: For
I say unto you, I will not any more eat thereof, until it be fulfilled
in the kingdom of God.
I am inclined to think that the people who made
it something else were offended by the Jewish connection and preferred
that it be connected with a pagan religion instead for their own twisted
reasons. The feast of Dionysus was a counterfeit of God's Passover
feast, created by Satan to entice people into that pagan religion. He is
always making counterfeits of the true, either to attempt to mock God
and bring Him down to his level, or to deceive his followers, or both.
Let's have a little background on Dionysus. Here
is some information that I compiled for another article:
In the Encyclopedia Britainnica (1963
and 1974 editions) Dionysus is described "in Greek cult and mythology, a
nature god of fruitfulness and vegetation, but tending to specialize as
a god of wine...The alternative names Bacchus (Bacchos...); Sabazuis and
Bassareus are Thracian." He was also called Bromios.
He is believed to have been introduced to Greece
from Thrace and Phyrgia. While in Greece the orgiastic worship of him
was toned down, "In his native country his worshippers sought to become
possessed by or assimilated to him by wild dancing and the tearing in
pieces and eating of animals..." The victims of this carnage may have
originally been human.
The female attendants of Dionysus were known as
the Maenads. Many women were attracted to him and took to the hills
wearing faun skins and crowns of ivy. The ivy wreath itself being one of
his personal attributes...Their ritual cry was "Euoi!" They danced by
torchlight to the flute and kettledrum and used wine freely. While under
the god's power (really devils) they supposedly possessed occult powers,
could charm snakes, suckle animals, and were given super strength to
tear their living victims in pieces before devouring them raw. In Greece
a dancing circle surrounded his altar. Through this complete,
unconditional surrender to the devils in this orgy, they believed they
could cross over into the eternal, spiritual realm.
The phallus was a prominent symbol in Dionysus'
rituals and was carried in processions in his honor...His followers
included fertility spirits, such as satyrs.
He was said to have the "gift" of prophecy and
was given a position at that wretched shrine of Delphi only slightly
lower than that of Apollo. He often took animal forms and, interestingly
enough, was associated with the lion, among others.
Silenus in mythology was the son of Hermes or
Pan (Satan). He was said to be a nymph and was the companion and nurse
of Dionysus. Which gives room for speculation regarding sodomy since
Hermes was associated with such.
Silenus was often depicted in the Bacchus' train
in art and was generally shown as "a little pot-bellied old man with
snub nose and bald head, riding on an ass and supported by satyrs..."
(Quite appropriately, there is a statue of him carrying an infant
Dionysus in the Vatican.) In the plural they were said to be the same as
satyrs, but older, wiser and drunker. They were characterized as
prophets and expert musicians.
So, yes, the idea of exalting Dionysus is
revolting in any context, but especially trying to superimpose him into
a mockery of the Lord's Supper. However, considering the context of the
Olympic tableau in Paris, it is hardly surprising that they would
include him.
Why C. S. Lewis?
This brings me to the hypocrisy that I noticed
pretty quickly. All the Christians who were crying out against this evil
representation of "The Last Supper" painting and were angry about the
inclusion of Dionysus gave me pause to consider. I wonder how many of
them consider C. S. Lewis to be a good, godly Christian whose writings
are to be admired and honored. Probably most of them.
A few quotes from
Prince Caspian to show the
extreme Lewis went to while including this pagan and vile god in
the feast scene:
p. 152 - "The crowd and the dance round Aslan...grew so thick
and rapid that Lucy was confused...One was a youth, dressed only
in a fawn-skin, with vine-leaves wreathed in his curly hair. His
face would have been almost too pretty for a boy's, if it had
not looked so extremely wild...He seemed to have a great many
names --- Bromios, Bassareus, and the Ram...There were a lot of
girls with him, as wild as he. There was even...someone on a
donkey...and everybody was shouting out, 'Euan, euan,
eu-oi-oi-oi.'"
p. 154 - "...the laughter never ceased nor the yodeling cries of
Euan, euan, eu-oi-oi-oi-oi,..At that moment the sun was just
rising and Lucy remembered something and whispered to Susan,
"...The boy with the wild face is Bacchus and the old one on the
donkey is Silenus..."
p. 192 - "Bacchus and the Maenads --- his fierce, madcap girls
--- and Silenus, were still with them..." |
Here is where the rubber meets the road, as the saying goes. Why would
the world take Christians seriously who cry out against having Dionysus
included in an admittedly vile representation of "The Last Supper" when
most of these same Christians are perfectly fine with C. S. Lewis
including him in the celebration in the book Prince Caspian?
Ouch.
This is the thing that I have been seeing and
thinking about lately. So many Christians cry out against one thing and
another, and yet, when we dig a little deeper into their own practices
and beliefs, we find that they are blatant hypocrites. How can we be
surprised or upset when people refuse to take Christianity seriously
when Christians don't themselves!?
They claim to hate the sins of the LGBTQ+
lifestyles, and yet they love movies and T.V. shows and books that not
only include, but glamorize these very things. Take Beauty and the
Beast from Disney, for example. A bunch of Christians just can't
let go of it, despite a prominent character who is humorously portrayed
as a homosexual.
Even the world knows that we are commanded to "...Love
your enemies, do good to them which hate you" (Luke 6:27), and
yet so many "Christian" conservatives have actively joined the hate
feasts that surround political figures.
Some Christians will speak boldly about
believing the word of God and holding scripture in high esteem, and yet
you can read through entire articles, blog posts, and listen to pod
casts and get ZERO Bible from them to support
anything they are saying, even when there was solid scriptural
teaching on it.
And here, in this case, are a bunch of
professing and real believers talking about how vile Dionysus is and how
terrible this tableau is, and yet, sitting on their bookshelves at home
are books claimed to be Christian allegories which contain a feast with
Dionysus and his wild women followers and Silenus. These false gods are
portrayed in attendance with Aslan and the "good guys" as they celebrate
Prince Caspian's return to the kingdom. (See
this page for
more detailed information.)
How can we expect people to take Christianity
seriously in face of these gross inconsistencies? And, believe you me,
there are people who see it. Don't make the mistake of thinking these
thing go unnoticed.
If you're going to cry out against the wicked
attacks against the person and sacrifice of the Lord Jesus Christ, maybe
stop and think about being consistent in your own life first. Is there a
beam in the eye of the world? Yes. I mean, they are lost and on their
way to hell. What can you expect? But, what is that beam in your own
eye? Do you have a set of The Chronicles of Narnia in your
home? Do you recommend it to children to read? Go back and read about
the history of Dionysus. Then reread the quotes from Prince Caspian.
Do you really think that Dionysus is a "fun" character who should be
introduced to children as a "good guy" and a friend of Jesus Christ (as
Aslan supposedly represents)??
People who are genuinely burdened for the lost
and want to see people born again don't understand why they aren't taken
seriously sometimes. Well, it's time to stop this namby-pamby, lukewarm
version of Christianity and start living like they say they believe.
Maybe some people need to even start
believing something for a change, I mean belief that puts its
shoes on and walks the walk in everyday life, not just blabs on social
media and in the church foyer. Just sayin'...
1 Peter 1:13-21
Wherefore gird up the loins of your mind, be sober, and hope to the end
for the grace that is to be brought unto you at the revelation of Jesus
Christ; As obedient children, not fashioning yourselves according to the
former lusts in your ignorance: But as he which hath called you is holy,
so be ye holy in all manner of conversation; Because it is written, Be
ye holy; for I am holy. And if ye call on the Father, who without
respect of persons judgeth according to every man's work, pass the time
of your sojourning here
in fear: Forasmuch as ye know that ye were not redeemed with corruptible
things, as
silver and gold, from your vain conversation
received by
tradition from your fathers; But with the precious blood of Christ, as
of a lamb without blemish and without spot: Who verily was foreordained
before the foundation of the world, but was manifest in these last times
for you, Who by him do believe in God, that raised him up from the dead,
and gave him glory; that your faith and hope might be in God.
1 Corinthians
16:13-14 Watch ye, stand fast in the faith, quit you like men, be
strong. Let all your things be done with charity.
Conclusion
At the end of the day, those people aren't going
to get away with mocking God. And that is a fearful thing for them.
Galatians 6:7 Be not deceived; God is not
mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap.
But, that applies to you too, Christian. You are
going to answer to God for yourself someday.
Romans 14:12 So then
every one of us shall give account of himself to God.
Are you crying out against the very things that
you allow in your own personal life?
Romans 14:21-22
It is
good neither to eat flesh, nor to drink wine, nor
any thing
whereby thy brother stumbleth, or is offended, or is made weak. Hast
thou faith? have it
to thyself before God. Happy is
he that condemneth not himself in that thing which he alloweth.
Are you condemning yourself in the things you
allow in your life, in your home, in your children's lives? If yes, then
don't be surprised when your kids someday walk away from God. Don't be
surprised when people you try to witness to call you out as a hypocrite.
Don't be surprised when the world doesn't take Jesus Christ seriously
when the only Jesus you have ever shown them is a cheap imitation of
your own creation - a Jesus who, to all appearances, is ok with you
embracing the world even while you gripe about it.
Just to be clear: I heard one man claiming that Jesus would
sit down at a table with drag queens. The implication was rather
revolting in the context of the Paris debacle. Jesus Christ
didn't sit with sinner to make them feel accepted. He sat with
them to give them an opportunity to repent and believe on Him.
He doesn't sit with sinners in their sin, He sits with them to
call them away from it, to offer them eternal life - but only on
His terms. |
And here is food for thought: Those people in Paris who are responsible
for that wretched tableau are sinners that Jesus died for, just as much
as you and I are. They don't know Him yet. Maybe none of them ever will,
but maybe some might. Because here's the thing, Jesus didn't come to
save just nice, semi-clean, moderately moral people. He came to save the
lost.
Luke 5:31-32 And
Jesus answering said unto them, They that are whole need not a
physician; but they that are sick. I came not to call the righteous, but
sinners to repentance.
2 Peter 3:9 The Lord
is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is
longsuffering to us-ward, not willing
that any should perish, but that
all
should come to repentance. [Emphasis
added.]
1 Corinthians 6:9-11 Know ye not that the
unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived:
neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor
abusers of themselves with mankind, Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor
drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of
God. And such were some of you: but ye are washed, but ye are
sanctified, but ye are justified in the name of the Lord Jesus, and by
the Spirit of our God.
Let's live like it.
background and graphics by Mary Stephens
vintage graphic: unknown source
|